Skip to Main Content

Oracle Database Free

Announcement

For appeals, questions and feedback about Oracle Forums, please email oracle-forums-moderators_us@oracle.com. Technical questions should be asked in the appropriate category. Thank you!

Startup fails with ORA-00600 [ksipc: no private ips avail for use] (as of 23.26.1) on machine without an IPv4 address

Simon_PJul 23 2026

TL;DR: Starting with Free Edition release 23.26.1, database startup results in ORA-00600 [ksipc: no private ips avail for use] and instance crash if no IPv4 IP address is assigned. This is likely a newly introduced bug as 23.26.0 and below start successfully without a network (minimal networking). Manually adding an IPv4 to the downed interface resolves the problem.


Full details:

A colleague pointed out that Free Edition release 23.26.2 was failing to start, and was actually getting an ORA-00600, if started on a machine without a network. Earlier versions, up to and including 23.26.0.0.0 work fine with only a loopback adapter.

Testing the 26ai versions of Free Edition without a network resulted in:

  • Version 23.26.2.0.0 - ORA-00600, database cannot be started
  • Version 23.26.1.0.0 - ORA-00600, database cannot be started
  • Version 23.26.0.0.0 - works as expected & database starts successfully!

The actual error from the alert log is:

ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [ksipc: no private ips avail for use], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], []

And there is a resulting trace file, but providing it here is probably uncessessary as this problem is easily reproducable.

Steps to reproduce:

  1. Installing Free Edition 23.26.2 into a VM (Running Oracle Linux 8.10) in VirtualBox
  2. Shutdown VM
  3. Uncheck the "Cable Connected" checkbox in the VirtualBox network adapter configuration
  4. Restart the VM and either let the service, or manually try to start the database --> ORA-00600 will be encountered and database will fail to start

Under such a scenario, the network configuration will look similar to:

# ip addr
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
   link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
   inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
   inet6 ::1/128 scope host
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: enp0s3: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state DOWN group default qlen 1000
   link/ether 08:00:27:64:8b:1a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff

To bypass the ORA-00600 and have the database start, all that's required is to assign an IPv4 IP address to the interface. The interface doesn't even need to be started. For example:

# sudo ip addr add 10.0.2.15/24 dev enp0s3

# ip addr
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
   link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
   inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
   inet6 ::1/128 scope host
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: enp0s3: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state DOWN group default qlen 1000
   link/ether 08:00:27:64:8b:1a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
   inet 10.0.2.15/24 scope global enp0s3
      valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

Now it has an IP address while still without a carrier. And we can leave the interface physically down but now that the interface owns an IP address, the database will start normally.

This seems to be a newly introduced 23.26.1 and above bug IMO as my testing conclusions are:

  • Situtation is completely and easily reproducible (on physical or virtualized systems)
  • Setting cluster_interconnects=':' has no effect
  • Resetting local_listener has no effect
  • Adding an IPv4 address to a non-loopback interface fixes it immediately
  • Adding an RFC1918 address to lo does not fix it
  • Adding only IPv6 to the interface does not fix it
  • A physical carrier is not required

And as stated already, this issue is not encountered with versions 23.26.0 and below.

Could someone from Oracle kindly confirm and perhaps a bug can be opened?

Thanks!

Simon

Comments
Post Details
Added on Jul 23 2026
1 comment
152 views