Skip to Main Content


843793Jul 10 2002 — edited May 13 2003
I would like some peoples comments on the readability of the Generic implementation in Java.

I have a lot of experience with templates in C++ and find that most non-trivial template classes quickly become completely unreadable by humans. Anyone who's browsed through the STL will whole-heartedly attest to this.

It's so bad that you can't even tell what methods each class has, and what they take as parameters. E.g. from algorithm, it even seems like a herculean task to figure out where the class begins and ends!

I could post some of the code here, but it's so bad that surely some would think that it's a joke. So, how does Java readability compare?

Locked Post
New comments cannot be posted to this locked post.
Post Details
Locked due to inactivity on Jun 10 2003
Added on Jul 10 2002