Skip to Main Content

Integration

Announcement

For appeals, questions and feedback about Oracle Forums, please email oracle-forums-moderators_us@oracle.com. Technical questions should be asked in the appropriate category. Thank you!

Interested in getting your voice heard by members of the Developer Marketing team at Oracle? Check out this post for AppDev or this post for AI focus group information.

What is the solution for ORABPEL-02182 ???

642368Jul 31 2010 — edited Feb 27 2020
Please find below trace... how to rectify this ?? Please if anybody can help me iam in urgent need to resolve this issue. this is related to 10.1.3 bpel process.


InvokeProcessEmployees
[2010/07/31 08:35:13] Invoked 1-way operation "ProcessEmployees" on partner "ProcessEmployees". More...
Wait_1
[2010/07/31 08:35:13] Waiting for the expiry time "2010/07/31 08:35:43".
</sequence>
<scope>
</sequence>
[2010/07/31 08:35:13] There is a system exception while performing the BPEL instance, the reason is "JTA transaction is not present or the transaction is not in active state. The current JTA transaction is not present or it is not in active state when processing activity or instance "4,840,005". The reason is The execution of this instance "4840005" for process "ADPHr" is supposed to be in a jta transaction, but the transaction is not present or in active state, please turn on the application server transaction debug logs to get more information.. Please consult your administrator regarding this error. ". Please check the error log file for more infromation. Please try to use bpel fault handlers to catch the faults in your bpel process. If this is a system exception, please report this to your system administrator. Administrator could perform manual recovery of the instance from last non-idempotent activity or dehydration point. More...
[2010/07/31 08:35:13] BPEL process instance #"4840005" cancelled


There is a system exception while performing the BPEL instance, the reason is "JTA transaction is not present or the transaction is not in active state. The current JTA transaction is not present or it is not in active state when processing activity or instance "4,840,005". The reason is The execution of this instance "4840005" for process "ADPHr" is supposed to be in a jta transaction, but the transaction is not present or in active state, please turn on the application server transaction debug logs to get more information.. Please consult your administrator regarding this error. ". Please check the error log file for more infromation. Please try to use bpel fault handlers to catch the faults in your bpel process. If this is a system exception, please report this to your system administrator. Administrator could perform manual recovery of the instance from last non-idempotent activity or dehydration point. less
<message>
ORABPEL-02182

JTA transaction is not present or the transaction is not in active state.
The current JTA transaction is not present or it is not in active state when processing activity or instance "4,840,005". The reason is The execution of this instance "4840005" for process "ADPHr" is supposed to be in a jta transaction, but the transaction is not present or in active state, please turn on the application server transaction debug logs to get more information..
Please consult your administrator regarding this error.

at com.collaxa.cube.engine.CubeEngine.store(CubeEngine.java:6001)
at com.collaxa.cube.engine.CubeEngine.endRequest(CubeEngine.java:6307)
at com.collaxa.cube.engine.CubeEngine.createAndInvoke(CubeEngine.java:1111)
at com.collaxa.cube.engine.delivery.DeliveryService.handleInvoke(DeliveryService.java:650)
at com.collaxa.cube.engine.ejb.impl.CubeDeliveryBean.handleInvoke(CubeDeliveryBean.java:381)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.joinpoint.EJBJoinPointImpl.invoke(EJBJoinPointImpl.java:35)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.DMSInterceptor.invoke(DMSInterceptor.java:52)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.JAASInterceptor$1.run(JAASInterceptor.java:31)
at com.evermind.server.ThreadState.runAs(ThreadState.java:705)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.JAASInterceptor.invoke(JAASInterceptor.java:34)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.TxRequiredInterceptor.invoke(TxRequiredInterceptor.java:50)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.DMSInterceptor.invoke(DMSInterceptor.java:52)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.InvocationContextPool.invoke(InvocationContextPool.java:55)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.StatelessSessionEJBObject.OC4J_invokeMethod(StatelessSessionEJBObject.java:87)
at CubeDeliveryBean_LocalProxy_4bin6i8.handleInvoke(Unknown Source)
at com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.message.invoke.InvokeInstanceMessageHandler.handle(InvokeInstanceMessageHandler.java:37)
at com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.DispatchHelper.handleMessage(DispatchHelper.java:148)
at com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.BaseDispatchTask.run(BaseDispatchTask.java:58)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:650)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:675)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
</message

Edited by: user639365 on Jul 31, 2010 5:57 AM
Comments
Locked Post
New comments cannot be posted to this locked post.
Post Details
Locked on Aug 31 2010
Added on Jul 31 2010
18 comments
3,883 views