Oracle Database Discussions

Announcement

For appeals, questions and feedback about Oracle Forums, please email oracle-forums-moderators_us@oracle.com. Technical questions should be asked in the appropriate category. Thank you!

[SOLVED] registry$history doesn't reflect the correct patch number

Adhika WMay 6 2009 — edited May 8 2009

Hi all,

I just upgraded a 10g 10.2.0.3 from patch 18 to patch 29.
I'm using windows 2003 X86-64.

normally after finishing the installation I checked again using opatch lsinventory and query to registry$history table.

my result after upgrade showed that in registry$history, the ID is 7558071 and the comments column is Patch 28.

the opatch lsinventory returned 7631957 which is patch 29.

is this a bug? why is this happening?

Thank you,
Adhika

Edited by: adhika on May 8, 2009 1:16 PM

Locked Post

New comments cannot be posted to this locked post.

Locked on Jun 5 2009

Added on May 6 2009

#general-database-discussions

14 comments

2,293 views