Skip to Main Content

Integration

Announcement

For appeals, questions and feedback about Oracle Forums, please email oracle-forums-moderators_us@oracle.com. Technical questions should be asked in the appropriate category. Thank you!

Problem with Jolt Repository Editing

Deb_MukherjeeDec 3 2013 — edited Dec 18 2013

Greetings to all,

I am suffering with a problem.A deficit of knowledge.

Here it is:

Our applications are running on Solaris 10 and Tuxedo 11gr1. If i need to add service in Jolt Repository how do I do it?

All I have access to server is via a Putty Terminal (black screen console) and we have a jolt repository file which I do not understand completely.

It has lines like this :

add PKG/GETFLTSCHDFRI01: I think this is a package.

add SVC/GETFLTSCHDFRI01: I think this is service declaration.

bt=FML32:ex=1:BT=FML32:vs=3:bp:pf=167772161:po=1:

pn=DATA:pa=rw:pt=string:ep:bp:pf=167772162:po=1:\

pn=END_USER:pa=rw:pt=string:ep:bp:pf=167772163:po=1:

pn=SERVICE_NAME:pa=rw:pt=string:ep:

What I could interpret/guess is -

bt - buffer type.

ex - No idea

BT - buffer type. why twice?

pn is parameter name for service GETFLTSCHDFRI01.It has 3 of them.

pt is parameter type.

pa - parameter access permissions .

ep - No idea

bp - No idea

pf -  No idea

po - No idea

add SVC/.GETSVC:vs=1:ex=0:bt=FML32:bp:

pn=REPNAME:pt=string:pf=167772161:pa=wr:ep:bp:pn=REPVALUE:pt=string:pf=167772162:pa=rd:ep:bp:

pn=STATLIN:pt=string:pf=167772163:pa=rd:ep:

add SVC/.GETREC:vs=1:ex=0:bt=FML32:bp:

pn=REPNAME:pt=string:pf=167772161:pa=wr:ep:bp:

pn=REPVALUE:pt=string:pf=167772162:pa=rd:ep:bp:

pn=STATLIN:pt=string:pf=167772163:pa=rd:ep:

Now why this "." is before GETSVC or  GETREC -  - No idea

Is there any way to understand this file completely and manually edit it to add a new service?

Please help.

Regards,

Deb

This post has been answered by Bob Finan-Oracle on Dec 6 2013
Jump to Answer
Comments
Locked Post
New comments cannot be posted to this locked post.
Post Details
Locked on Jan 15 2014
Added on Dec 3 2013
7 comments
3,107 views