Performance between CLOB and VARCHAR2
441000Aug 8 2005 — edited Aug 8 2005I would like to know if there is any really performance issues between CLOB and VARCHAR2 data types?
In particular, why would it not be better to declare all large text items as CLOB rather than VARCHAR2(4000) in a table? For example, if I am going to store about a page of text, in a table, why not standardize of CLOB? Only use VARCHAR2 for small text items.