Skip to Main Content

SQL & PL/SQL

Announcement

For appeals, questions and feedback about Oracle Forums, please email oracle-forums-moderators_us@oracle.com. Technical questions should be asked in the appropriate category. Thank you!

ORA-01436 : CONNECT BY loop - is sequence of keys important?

732307Nov 5 2009 — edited Nov 25 2009
Hi everyone

I'm seeing an ORA-01436 error - CONNECT BY loop in user data - when I'm running the query below:

select distinct(pose.organization_id_child)
from per_org_structure_elements pose
where pose.org_structure_version_id =
(select posv.org_structure_version_id
from per_org_structure_versions posv
where trunc(sysdate) between posv.date_from and nvl(posv.date_to,'31-DEC-4712'))
start with pose.organization_id_parent = xxx
connect by prior pose.organization_id_child = pose.organization_id_parent;

(I'm connecting to a Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.8.0 database by the way)

This error doesn't always crop up - if I change the organization_id_parent value in the start with section of the query above, I find that it only happens for certain organization_ids. However, for the organization_ids where it does happen, upon examining the data for both parent and child rows, I can't understand why a CONNECT BY loop might be happening.

For example, the two rows below cause issues whenever I try to use their organization_id_parent in the query:

Senior Store Manager level (second from bottom):

ORG_STRUCTURE_ELEMENT_ID 34305
BUSINESS_GROUP_ID 1
ORGANIZATION_ID_PARENT 667
ORG_STRUCTURE_VERSION_ID 224
ORGANIZATION_ID_CHILD 571

Store level (bottom level):

ORG_STRUCTURE_ELEMENT_ID 34304
BUSINESS_GROUP_ID 1
ORGANIZATION_ID_PARENT 571
ORG_STRUCTURE_VERSION_ID 224
ORGANIZATION_ID_CHILD 570

As you can see, the org_id_parent value at the bottom level is greater than the actual org_id_child value at that same level. Could this be what is causing the ORA-01436 error? It's the only thing that's come to mind so far!

Any help would be gratefully received.

Thanks, Geoff
Comments
Locked Post
New comments cannot be posted to this locked post.
Post Details
Locked on Dec 23 2009
Added on Nov 5 2009
6 comments
1,235 views