Skip to Main Content

Oracle Database Discussions

Announcement

For appeals, questions and feedback about Oracle Forums, please email oracle-forums-moderators_us@oracle.com. Technical questions should be asked in the appropriate category. Thank you!

ORA-00600 Error after turning on CURSOR_SHARING=FORCE

3128072Aug 7 2017 — edited Aug 8 2017

Hello,

My system has had a lot of wait time showing up recently and after some research, it looked like the culprit was running a lot of similar but not identical queries without any bind parameters.  It looked like turning on forced cursor sharing might be a solution to this problem. So I did the following to the system:

     ALTER SYSTEM SET CURSOR_SHARING = FORCE;

The system was not under load at the time but the next day when the users came back and started working, I started getting internal errors in the alert log like this:

     Errors in file /orasys/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/XXXXX/XXXXX/trace/XXXXX_ora_10245.trc  (incident=139422):

     ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kghstack_free1], [kkqvtSyncOptBinds: srcbindpp], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], []

     Use ADRCI or Support Workbench to package the incident.

     See Note 411.1 at My Oracle Support for error and packaging details.

     Mon Aug 07 13:09:34 2017

     Sweep [inc][139422]: completed

Then the trace file has this:

     ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kghstack_free1], [kkqvtSyncOptBinds: srcbindpp], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], []

     Corruption might have been caused by writing

     past the end of previous header (comment=kkqvtSyncOptBinds: srcbindpp addr=9fffffffbf10ffb8)

     Corrupted stack chunk header at location 9fffffffbf10ffd8

followed by a huge hex dump.

The good news is that the system performance did improve and the waiting went away.  The bad news is of course this error.

Some other pertinent details:

      Oracle Enterprise Edition 12c

     Version:     12.1.0.2.0

     OS:          HP/UX 11.31 Itanium

     Memory:      64G

     Data Size:   ~900GB

     Single Instance

One hint that I found suggested that there might be issues with partitioned tables of which we have many.

Any thoughts?

Comments
Locked Post
New comments cannot be posted to this locked post.
Post Details
Locked on Sep 5 2017
Added on Aug 7 2017
2 comments
270 views