Skip to Main Content

Oracle Database Discussions

Announcement

For appeals, questions and feedback about Oracle Forums, please email oracle-forums-moderators_us@oracle.com. Technical questions should be asked in the appropriate category. Thank you!

High I/O wait on server

RobeenApr 9 2019 — edited Apr 10 2019

Oracle Database 12.2.0

RHEL 7.4

Hello Team,

I have noticed that there is very high I/O wait on my database where ASM is configured.

Extract from alert log:

ns secondary err code: 12560

TNS-12541: TNS:no listener

nt main err code: 511

ns secondary err code: 12560

nt main err code: 511

TNS-00511: No listener

nt secondary err code: 111

TNS-00511: No listener

nt OS err code: 0

nt secondary err code: 111

nt OS err code: 0

2019-04-09T10:04:49.840281+04:00

WARNING:io_getevents timed out 600 sec

2019-04-09T10:06:22.269531+04:00

WARNING:io_getevents timed out 600 sec

2019-04-09T10:07:11.432429+04:00

WARNING:io_getevents timed out 600 sec

2019-04-09T10:09:33.538552+04:00

WARNING:io_getevents timed out 600 sec

2019-04-09T10:10:04.687501+04:00

WARNING:io_getevents timed out 600 sec

Errors in file /u01/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/dware1/DWARE1/trace/DWARE1_ora_13750.trc (incident=673015):

ORA-00494: enqueue [CF] held for too long (more than 900 seconds) by 'inst 1, osid 6227'

2019-04-09T09:59:04.452946+04:00

Killing enqueue blocker (pid=6227) on resource CF-00000000-00000000-00000000-00000000 by (pid=13750)

by terminating the process

2019-04-09T09:59:04.470010+04:00

Attempt to get Control File Enqueue by USER pid=13750 (mode=X, type=0, timeout=300) is being blocked by inst=1, pid=6227

Please check inst 1's alert log for more information on the blocker including a possible ORA-00494 and related incident logs

I also see the %util for 2 disks is very high.

pastedImage_4.png

We have noticed that %util is very high between 09 to 12:00 since fulll table scan is being performed on tables with parallelism enabled

pastedImage_5.png

Please advise.

Thanks,

Joe

Comments
Post Details
Added on Apr 9 2019
20 comments
7,969 views