Skip to Main Content

APEX

Announcement

For appeals, questions and feedback about Oracle Forums, please email oracle-forums-moderators_us@oracle.com. Technical questions should be asked in the appropriate category. Thank you!

From/To headers with <tt>apex_mail</tt>

fac586Apr 24 2012 — edited Apr 25 2012
In +{message:id=2382999}+ Joel suggests using the following format for <tt>p_to</tt> and <tt>p_from</tt> parameters in <tt>apex_mail.send</tt> to generate literal To/From email headers.
begin
  /*
    Of course "invalid" is not used...
  */
  apex_mail.send(
      p_to => '"Foobar"<foo@bar.com.invalid>',
      p_from => '"Baz"<baz@bar.com.invalid>',
      p_subj => 'RFC 821',
      p_body => 'This is a problem');
end;
This works on a development box when the APEX SMTP Host is set to <tt>localhost</tt> on port 25 (and I have no idea what SMTP software is servicing this). However when the customer's Lotus Domino mail server is hooked in to comply with their email policies, it fails with
ORA-29279: SMTP permanent error: 501 Syntax error, parameters in command "RCPT TO:"Foobar"<foo@bar.com.invalid>" unrecognized or missing
The project has a definite requirement for the From header to present with different display information when sent from different environments (although the underlying email address will be the same). We'd prefer to use <tt>apex_mail</tt> to get logging and easy HTML formatting, but it looks like there's no possibility of meeting the displayed From header requirements using the combination of <tt>apex_mail</tt> and Lotus Domino SMTP server. Unless anyone knows different, we'll have to abandon <tt>apex_mail</tt> and implement something using <tt>utl_smtp</tt> where we've got more granular control to use RFC 821/5321-compliant <tt>MAIL FROM/RCPT TO</tt> and separate To/From <tt>DATA</tt> headers with the relevant display information?

APEX 3.0.0.00.20
Oracle 10.2.0.3 EE
Comments
Locked Post
New comments cannot be posted to this locked post.
Post Details
Locked on May 23 2012
Added on Apr 24 2012
4 comments
529 views