Skip to Main Content

Oracle Database Discussions

Announcement

For appeals, questions and feedback about Oracle Forums, please email oracle-forums-moderators_us@oracle.com. Technical questions should be asked in the appropriate category. Thank you!

Interested in getting your voice heard by members of the Developer Marketing team at Oracle? Check out this post for AppDev or this post for AI focus group information.

Deadlock

happy10319Dec 19 2019 — edited Dec 20 2019

Hi,

On 11.2.0.4

When deadlock, we have the following in trc file:

How to interprete this information  and which action should be done  to resolve?

I see the same session (905) is at the same time blocker and waiter. Can be explained please?

Which object is locked? How can we unlock it?

Thanks.

*** 2019-12-15 15:08:28.002

*** SESSION ID:(1233.1531) 2019-12-15 15:08:28.002

*** CLIENT ID:(RSA:240025847196) 2019-12-15 15:08:28.002

*** SERVICE NAME:(sid) 2019-12-15 15:08:28.002

*** MODULE NAME:(XX/APEX:DUU 111:131) 2019-12-15 15:08:28.002

*** ACTION NAME:(Processes - point: BEFORE_BOX_BODY) 2019-12-15 15:08:28.002

*** 2019-12-15 15:08:28.002

DEADLOCK DETECTED ( ORA-00060 )

[Transaction Deadlock]

The following deadlock is not an ORACLE error. It is a

deadlock due to user error in the design of an application

or from issuing incorrect ad-hoc SQL. The following

information may aid in determining the deadlock:

Deadlock graph:

                      ---------Blocker(s)--------  ---------Waiter(s)---------

Resource Name          process session holds waits  process session holds waits

TX-00350006-00064247       348    1233     X            441     905           X

TX-002b000a-000ed507       441     905     X            348    1233           X

session 1233: DID 0001-015C-00000174    session 905: DID 0001-01B9-00000356

session 905: DID 0001-01B9-00000356     session 1233: DID 0001-015C-00000174

Regards.

This post has been answered by Jonathan Lewis on Dec 20 2019
Jump to Answer
Comments
Post Details
Added on Dec 19 2019
5 comments
553 views