Skip to Main Content

Hardware

Announcement

For appeals, questions and feedback about Oracle Forums, please email oracle-forums-moderators_us@oracle.com. Technical questions should be asked in the appropriate category. Thank you!

Data Validation with key miscompare

1590135d-7084-48bb-830f-8accc63d05dbAug 30 2017 — edited Aug 31 2017

Setup :

Using vdbench version 50406

From an  nfs share, we carve out shares which are provided to Win7 machines as smb share. This smb share is mapped to Z drive. And we run vdbench on this Z drive with journaling enabled.

Here is the configuration file used :

create_anchors=yes

validate=yes

validate=read

validate=read_after_write

validate=no_preread

validate=time

journal=yes

journal=noflush

fsd=fsd1,anchor=z:\vdbench2,depth=1,width=1,files=100,size=(3M,5,1M,5,20M,5,16M,5,8M,5,24M,5,512K,30,128K,20,256K,20)

fwd=fwd1,fsd=fsd1,operation=read,threads=32,fileio=random,xfersize=4k,fileselect=random

fwd=fwd2,fsd=fsd1,operation=write,threads=32,fileio=random,xfersize=4k,fileselect=random

rd=rd1,fwd=fwd*,fwdrate=100,format=yes,elapsed=129600,interval=5,iorate=3

Here is the link to results:

snippet from errorlog.html:

09:37:41.528 localhost-0: 09:37:41.496 Corrupted data block for fsd=fsd1,file=z:\vdbench2\vdb.1_1.dir\vdb_f0082.file; file lba: 0x00001000 xfersize=4096^M

09:37:41.528 localhost-0: 09:37:41.496 ^M

09:37:41.528 localhost-0: 09:37:41.496 Data block has 1 key block(s) of 4096 bytes each.^M

09:37:41.528 localhost-0: 09:37:41.496 All key blocks are corrupted.^M

09:37:41.528 localhost-0: 09:37:41.496 Key block lba: 0x119e1000^M

09:37:41.528 localhost-0: 09:37:41.496    Key block of 4,096 bytes has 8 512-byte sectors.^M

09:37:41.543 localhost-0: 09:37:41.496    Timeline: ^M

09:37:41.543 localhost-0: 09:37:41.512    Sun Aug 27 2017 08:43:33.187 PDT Sector last written. (As found in the first corrupted sector, timestamp is taken just BEFORE the actual write).^M

09:37:41.543 localhost-0: 09:37:41.512    Sun Aug 27 2017 09:21:58.748 PDT Key block was last read_after_write. (Timestamp is taken just AFTER the actual read or write).^M

09:37:41.543 localhost-0: 09:37:41.512    Sun Aug 27 2017 09:37:41.496 PDT Key block first found to be corrupted during a workload requested read.^M

09:37:41.543 localhost-0: 09:37:41.512 ^M

09:37:41.543 localhost-0: 09:37:41.512    All 8 sectors in this key block are corrupted.^M

09:37:41.543 localhost-0: 09:37:41.512    All corruptions are of the same type: ^M

09:37:41.543 localhost-0: 09:37:41.512    ===> Data Validation Key miscompare. Expecting key=0x51 received key=0x50 (81/80)^M

09:37:41.543 localhost-0: 09:37:41.512    Only the FIRST sector will be reported:^M

09:37:41.543 localhost-0: 09:37:41.512 ^M

09:37:41.543 localhost-0: 09:37:41.512         Data Validation error for fsd=fsd1; FSD lba: 0x119e1000; Key block size: 4096; relative sector in data block: 0x00 ^M

09:37:41.543 localhost-0: 09:37:41.512         File name: z:\vdbench2\vdb.1_1.dir\vdb_f0082.file; file block lba: 0x00001000; bad sector file lba: 0x00001000^M

09:37:41.543 localhost-0: 09:37:41.528 0x000   00000000 119e1000 ........ ........   00000000 119e1000 0000015e 245cc543^M

09:37:41.543 localhost-0: 09:37:41.528 0x010   51..0000 31647366 20202020 00000000   50e70000 31647366 20202020 00000e24^M

09:37:41.543 localhost-0: 09:37:41.528         There are no mismatches in bytes 32-511

^M

09:37:41.543 localhost-0: 09:37:41.543 Time that this key block 0x119e1000 was last used for read_after_write: Sun Aug 27 2017 09:21:58.748 PDT^M

09:37:41.543 localhost-0: 09:37:41.543 09:37:41.543 op: read   lun: z:\vdbench2\vdb.1_1.dir\vdb_f0082.file lba:         4096 0x00001000 xfer:     4096 errno: 60003: '60003            A Data Validation error was discovered'

So it wrote 0x51 and expecting 0x51 but got 0x50.

Did it actually write 0x51 ? or it failed and vdbench went ahead for read. ?

We verified the file content again by reading in that offset, it has 0x50 only now.

So did we actually hit data corruption or its false alarm ?

Comments
Locked Post
New comments cannot be posted to this locked post.
Post Details
Locked on Sep 28 2017
Added on Aug 30 2017
2 comments
1,441 views