Skip to Main Content

Oracle Database Discussions

Announcement

For appeals, questions and feedback about Oracle Forums, please email oracle-forums-moderators_us@oracle.com. Technical questions should be asked in the appropriate category. Thank you!

Configuring database to accept 2500 user connections

james_pJun 26 2020 — edited Jun 29 2020

DB version: 19c Enterprise Edition

OS : Oracle Linux 8.2

Hardware specs:

Dell PowerEdge series with 32 cores(AMD Epyc), 256 GB RAM

I am building a 2-node RAC DB which should be capable of accepting a total of 2500 user connections (sessions).

I will be building a container DB with two PDBs

Application 1 will spawn 2000 sessions(Peak) to PDB1

Application 2 will spawn  500 sessions(peak) to PDB2

Following are what I am going to handle these user sessions.

1. At container DB (root) level, configure SGA_TARGET=128GB and PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET=50GB but I don't set anything at PDB level.

2. Setting PROCESSES parameter:

   I need a total of 2500 user connections to be serviced for both PDB1 and PDB2.

   Documentation is not clear whether PROCESSES is at instance level or DB level, it just says

   "PROCESSES specifies the maximum number of operating system user processes that can simultaneously connect to Oracle"

   https://docs.oracle.com/en/database/oracle/oracle-database/12.2/refrn/PROCESSES.html#GUID-B757AF80-DA38-4167-A914-FE376A3AD4FE

   Assuming PROCESSES parameter is at Instance level, splitting that across 2 instances 2500/2 = 1250

As per the documentation, PROCESSES parameter 'should allow' for all background processes such as locks, job queue processes, and parallel execution processes. So, I throw in another 150

    So, 1250 + 150 = 1400

Is setting PROCESSES=1400 for each instance enough ? I may use parallelism for reporting queries during off-peak hours. But, not more than 20 DOP.

3. At the linux ulimit, level I will be setting "max user processes" (nproc) hard limit to 1500 for each Oracle Linux servers.

4. Given that SGA_TARGET is 128GB, I will set shmmax to 130GB and shmall to 150GB

Are the above mentioned 4 configurations correct ? Are they enough or am I missing something ?

This post has been answered by Mark D Powell on Jun 29 2020
Jump to Answer
Comments
Post Details
Added on Jun 26 2020
10 comments
610 views