Skip to Main Content

Java EE (Java Enterprise Edition) General Discussion

Announcement

For appeals, questions and feedback about Oracle Forums, please email oracle-forums-moderators_us@oracle.com. Technical questions should be asked in the appropriate category. Thank you!

Casting to superclass JSTL

829153Jan 6 2011 — edited Jan 8 2011
Hi all,

I'm try to explain the scenario of the problem.

I have a jsp that receive in the request (from a spring controller) an object called queryResponse type QueryResponseWrapper that have just one property queryResponse type org.apache.solr.client.solrj.response.QueryResponse with getter and setter method.


On the jsp I have :

<c:forEach items="${queryResponse.results}" var="solrDocument" varStatus="status" >

........

</c:forEach>


"results", the property over i do the iteration, is not actually a property but a method called getResults with no argument that return a collection of object type SolrDocumentWrapper that extend another class SolrDocument.

In the class SolrDocumentWrapper have the method getHighlightingData with no arguments.


The problem is, inside the above for-each,

when I try in jstl to access to property of the object SolrDocument I have the data on the page

${solrDocument.content}

but

not when I try to access to property of the SolrDocumentWrapper class.

${solrDocument.highlightingData}

Seams to be that the object that I'm accessing is up-casted.

After that I found that problem I tried, just for a test, to override in the object SolrDocumentWrapper the toString method

@Override
public String toString(){
return this.highlightingData.toString();
}

a that point if I change my jsp to

<c:forEach items="${queryResponse.results}" var="solrDocument" varStatus="status" >
${solrDocument}
</c:forEach>
and I had the toString of the property highlightingData on the page.

{content=[ BASIC TEXT ]}

I tried to do do my best to explain the problem .....

Can anyone help me to understand why?


Thank you in advance.
Alessandro
Comments
Locked Post
New comments cannot be posted to this locked post.
Post Details
Locked on Feb 5 2011
Added on Jan 6 2011
2 comments
1,405 views