Is the intent behind the ALLOW_ON_PO_FLG in the BC portal to “Inactivate” the line on the BC or to allow the BC line to have a PO to be created from the BC? If it was flagged No in the BC would it generate a PR instead?
Workflow would be:
(BC within Lines) from PR → BC → BC Release as PO vs (BC without Lines/GSA) PR→BC→BC Release as PR .
In the above scenarios it doesn't seem to make sense to have an Allow on PO Flg field if a BC without Lines is used as the PR released from the BC would be different each time due to the nature of the style of contract a BC without lines is supposed to manage as well as there is no BC Line to hold that field against because there are no lines. And it doesn't seem to make sense for a BC with Lines because if it is on the BC, the SID Source Code should control for Inventory type contracts and for other types of BC's with Lines, the PR that authorized the spend on the BC will have the scope or material required so it should be released as a PO.
Please advise.