Hi Steve,
Currently, are there any compiling tests done on BOOST 1.55 without -std=c++11 and are there any corrections that need to be applied? So far, I have applied some of my workarounds when compiling without C++11 mode (no -std=c++11):
1.boost/config/compiler/sunpro_cc.hpp
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_AUTO_DECLARATIONS
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_AUTO_MULTIDECLARATIONS
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_CHAR16_T
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_CHAR32_T
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_CONSTEXPR
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_DECLTYPE
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_DECLTYPE_N3276
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_DEFAULTED_FUNCTIONS
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_DELETED_FUNCTIONS
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_EXPLICIT_CONVERSION_OPERATORS
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_EXTERN_TEMPLATE
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_DEFAULT_ARGS
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_INITIALIZER_LIST
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_LAMBDAS
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_LOCAL_CLASS_TEMPLATE_PARAMETERS
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_NOEXCEPT
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_NULLPTR
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_RANGE_BASED_FOR
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_RAW_LITERALS
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_RVALUE_REFERENCES
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_SCOPED_ENUMS
#define BOOST_NO_SFINAE_EXPR
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_STATIC_ASSERT
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_TEMPLATE_ALIASES
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_UNICODE_LITERALS
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_VARIADIC_TEMPLATES
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_VARIADIC_MACROS
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_UNIFIED_INITIALIZATION_SYNTAX
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_USER_DEFINED_LITERALS
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_ALIGNAS
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_TRAILING_RESULT_TYPES
#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_INLINE_NAMESPACES
un-comment out all of above lines.
2. libs/log/src/dump.cpp
221:#error Boost.Log: Unexpected compiler
un-comment out the line