Active\Active vs Active\Passive
529466Jun 11 2009 — edited Jun 29 2009My company was recently purchased. The new company has a "policy" about any High Availability database be an Active\Active configuration. We have in the past used active\passive RAC installs with each site have multiple active RAC nodes. I am interested in see what the cases are for a true Active\Active environment where there will be multiple RAC nodes in each "cluster" and multiple databases (disk) which are actively written to, then synchronized. (As apposed to a couple mutinode RAC setups with a primary\standby database)
Any white papers or best practice document references would be great. I'd hate to do this just case of some policy.
Thanks