Skip to Main Content

Infrastructure Software

Announcement

For appeals, questions and feedback about Oracle Forums, please email oracle-forums-moderators_us@oracle.com. Technical questions should be asked in the appropriate category. Thank you!

About Solaris Statistics Store Service Daemon (sstore) High Memory Usage

Yasin TARAKCIMar 5 2020

Hello All,

We discovered a new problem in Solaris 11.4.14.5.0 version and I wanted to share it with you. The solutions is below.

Solaris Statistics Store Service Daemon 'sstored' May Consume a Lot of Memory Due to Memory Leaks in the Daemon on a Solaris System Hosting Oracle Database with Solaris Version 11.4.9.5.0 or Later (Doc ID 2596279.1)

To work around this issue, disable the component in the 'sstored' daemon that manages collection of process stats. To disable proc provider in sstore SMF service, do the following:

#svccfg -s sstore:default setprop config/no-proc = integer: 1

#svcadm refresh sstore:default

   Verify that the property is set as below:

#svcprop -p config/no-proc system/sstore:default

    After setting this property, restart the service:

#svcadm restart sstore:default

   You can also verify that the proc provider has been disabled using mdb:

# mdb -p `pgrep sstored`

sstored:11933*> sspc_provider::print sstore_provider_t sp_disabled

sp_disabled = 1

Note: Before installing the fix for this issue, this workaround needs to be removed. To back out the workaround, the SMF property config/no_proc for sstore:default SMF service has to be removed and the service needs to be refreshed for the config change to take effect. To back out the workaround, do the following:

#svccfg -s sstore:default delprop config/no_proc

#svcadm refresh sstore:default

and then restart the sstore service:

# svcadm restart sstore:default

Resolution

This issue is addressed in the following releases:

SPARC Platform

Solaris 11.4.17.3.0 or later

x86 Platform

Solaris 11.4.17.3.0 or later

for your kind attention

Regards

Yasin

Comments
Post Details
Added on Mar 5 2020
0 comments
1,213 views